Does your team take risks and learn from failure, or operate in protective silence?
A team without psychological safety hides mistakes, avoids difficult conversations, and silently bleeds top talent. This assessment translates Amy Edmondson's renowned Harvard framework to evaluate authentic vulnerability, trust, and openness across your team.
Fundamentação Científica & Teórica
Originating from the seminal study "Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams", published in Administrative Science Quarterly. It is the most referenced and validated psychometric scale globally for measuring corporate team effectiveness.
Referência: Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
- 7 situations
- ~3 min minutes
- Result straight away
Answer based on the daily reality of your direct team. Takes ~3 minutes.
If you or someone makes an honest mistake on this team, is it held against you later?
Are members of your team able to bring up difficult problems and tough issues?
Do people on this team sometimes reject others for having different opinions?
How safe is it to take calculated risks and trial new working methods on this team?
How difficult is it for members to ask one another for help and guidance?
Is there a shared certainty that no one would deliberately undermine your efforts?
Are individual strengths, unique talents, and diverse skill sets fully utilized?
Empreendedor / Motivador
Mapeamento de Competências
By dimension
—
—
Your view is the starting point. The real team assessment is 360°.
Leaders typically view team climate as safer than direct reports actually experience. On the Upskill platform, we cross-reference leadership self-evaluations with anonymous team assessments, identifying blind spots with tailored action plans backed by our senior mentors and 24/7 mentorAI.
Want this diagnostic by email?
We send the result with the breakdown by dimension. Optional — your result is already above.
What now?
This diagnostic points to the gap. Development happens with method: a human mentor in the sessions and mentorIA 24/7 between them, running the same methodology.